German researchers create, then erase, false memories in people’s minds |
The team, from the University of Hagen, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien,
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, and the University of Portsmouth
conducted a series of memory experiments on volunteers over the course of
several sessions.
They wanted to both confirm that it is possible to implant (or incept, if
you will) false memories in the mind of a subject using certain
psychological techniques and tricks that rely heavily on the power of
suggestion through repetition, while also discovering to what extent these
memories can be erased.
In this latest experiment, the researchers created fictional, but plausible, stories from 52
participants’ childhoods and blended them with events that actually took
place.
The researchers then reinforced these false memories in the minds of the
participants by asking the volunteers’ parents to play along and claim
things happened exactly as described, including the additional, fictional
elements.
This process was repeated over the course of multiple sessions to such a
degree that many of the participants became convinced the accounts were, in
fact, true, and thus, a false memory was born.
Now all that remained was to extricate these false memories from the minds
of the volunteers, which turned out to be almost as easy as implanting them
had been.
They merely asked the volunteers to identify the source of the memory while
highlighting the fact that false memories can be created through a process
of repeated, elicited recall that itself can become a form of
conditioning.
“If you can bring people to this point where they are aware of that, you
can empower them to stay closer to their own memories and recollections, and
rule out the suggestion from other sources,” psychologist Aileen Oberst
at the University of Hagen says.
During follow-ups a year later, some 74 percent of the volunteers had lost
their false memories or even outright rejected them as ever having
occurred.
The implications of this kind of disturbing but important research might be
far-reaching in the realm of criminal justice, with methods employed by
prosecutors, police, and others called into question when seeking the
‘truth’ of a past event.
“Faulty memory may not matter in everyday life – if I tell you I had
chicken last night instead of pizza, it may not matter,” says
false-memory expert Elizabeth Loftus.
“But very precise memory does matter when we’re talking about these legal
cases. It matters whether the bad guy had curly hair or straight hair, or
whether the car went through a red light or a green light.”
Post a Comment