The middle kingdom in ancient Egypt |
Mentuhotep II’s
successors, Mentuhotep III (1957–45 BCE) and Mentuhotep IV
(1945–38 BCE), also ruled from Thebes. The reign of Mentuhotep IV
corresponds to seven years marked “missing” in the Turin Canon, and he
may later have been deemed illegitimate.
Records of a quarrying expedition to the Wadi Ḥammāmāt from his second regnal the year were inscribed on the order of his vizier Amenemhet, who almost certainly
succeeded to the throne and founded the 12th dynasty. Not all of the country welcomed
the 11th dynasty, the monuments, and self-presentation of which remained local
and Theban.
The 12th dynasty (1938–c. 1756 BCE)
Amenemhet I moved the capital back to the Memphite area, founding a residence named Itjet-towy, “she who takes possession of the Two Lands,” which was for later times the archetypal royal residence. Itjet-towy was probably situated between Memphis and the pyramids of Amenemhet I and Sesostris I (at modern Al-Lisht), while Memphis remained the center of the population. Later in the dynasty, there is the earliest evidence of a royal palace (not a capital) in the eastern delta. The return to the Memphite area was accompanied by a revival of Old Kingdom artistic styles, in a resumption of central traditions that contrasted with the local ones of the 11th dynasty. From the reign of Amenemhet major tombs of the first half of the dynasty, which display considerable local independence, are preserved at several sites, notably Beni Hasan, Meir, and Qau. After the second reign of the dynasty, no more important private tombs were constructed at Thebes, but several kings made benefactions from Theban temples.
In his 20th regnal year, Amenemhet I took his son Sesostris I (or
Senwosret, reigned 1908–1875 BCE) as his coregent, presumably in order to
ensure a smooth transition to the next reign. This practice was followed in the
next two reigns and recurred sporadically in later times. During the following
10 years of joint rule, Sesostris undertook campaigns in Lower Nubia that led
to its conquest as far as the central area of the Second Cataract. A series of
fortresses were begun in the region, and there was a full occupation, but the
local C Group population was not integrated culturally
with the conquerors.
In the early 12th dynasty the written language was regularized in its classical form of Middle Egyptian, a rather artificial idiom that was probably always somewhat removed from the vernacular. The first datable corpus of literary texts was composed in Middle Egyptian. Two of these relate directly to political affairs and offer fictional justifications for the rule of Amenemhet I and Sesostris I, respectively. Several that are ascribed to Old Kingdom authors or that describe events of the First Intermediate period but are composed in Middle Egyptian probably also date from around this time. The most significant of these is the Instruction for Merikare, a discourse on kingship and moral responsibility. It is often used as a source for the history of the First Intermediate period but may preserve no more than a memory of its events. Most of these texts continued to be copied in the New Kingdom.
Little is known of the reigns of Amenemhet II (1876–42 BCE) and Sesostris II (1844–37 BCE). These kings built their pyramids at the entrance to Al-Fayyūm while also beginning intensive exploitation of its agricultural potential that reached a peak in the reign of Amenemhet III (1818–1770 BCE). The king of the 12th dynasty with the most enduring reputation was Sesostris III (1836–18 BCE), who extended Egyptian conquests to Semna, at the south end of the Second Cataract, while also mounting at least one campaign to Palestine. Sesostris III completed an extensive chain of fortresses in the Second Cataract; at Semna he was worshiped as a god in the New Kingdom.
Frequent campaigns and military occupation, which lasted another
150 years, required a standing army. A force of this type may have been created
early in the 12th dynasty but becomes better attested near the end. It was
based on “soldiers”—whose title means literally “citizens”—levied by district
and officers of several grades and types. It was separate from the New Kingdom
military organization and seems not to have enjoyed a very high status.
Sesostris III reorganized Egypt into four regions corresponding to
the northern and southern halves of the Nile valley and the eastern and western
delta. Rich evidence for middle-ranking officials from the religious center
of Abydos and
for administrative practice in documents from Al-Lāhūn conveys an
impression of a pervasive,
centralized bureaucracy,
which later came to run the country under its own momentum. The prosperity
created by peace, conquests, and agricultural development is visible in royal
monuments and monuments belonging to the minor elite, but there was no small, powerful, and wealthy group of the sort seen in the Old and New Kingdoms.
Sesostris III and his successor, Amenemhet III (1818–c. 1770 BCE),
left a striking artistic legacy in the
form of statuary depicting them as aging, careworn rulers, probably alluding to
a conception of
the suffering king knew from the literature of the dynasty. This departure from
the bland ideal, which may have sought to bridge the gap between the king and
subjects in the aftermath of the attack on elite power was not taken up in
later times.
The reigns of Amenemhet III and Amenemhet IV (c. 1770–60 BCE)
and of Sebeknefru (c. 1760–56 BCE),
the first certainly attested female monarch was apparently peaceful, but the
accession of a woman marked the end of the dynastic line.
The 13th dynasty (c. 1756–c. 1630 BCE)
Despite a continuity of
outward forms and of the rhetoric of
inscriptions between the 12th and 13th dynasties,
there was a complete change in kingship. In little more than a century, about 70
kings occupied the throne. Many can have reigned only for months, and there
were probably rival claimants to the throne, but in principle, the royal
residence remained at Itjet-towy and the kings ruled the whole country. Egypt’s
hold on Lower Nubia was maintained, as was its position as the leading state in
the Middle East. Large numbers of private monuments document the prosperity of
the official classes, and the proliferation of titles is evidence of their continued
expansion. In government, the vizier assumed prime importance, and a single family held the office for much of a century.
Immigration from Asia is known in the late 12th dynasty and became more widespread in the 13th. From the late 18th century BCE, the northeastern Nile River delta was settled by successive waves of peoples from Palestine, who retained their own material culture. Starting with the Instruction for Merikare, Egyptian texts warn against the dangers of infiltration of this sort, and its occurrence shows a weakening of government. There may also have been a rival dynasty, called the 14th, at Xois in the north-central delta, but this is known only from Manetho’s history and could have had no more than local significance. Toward the end of this period, Egypt lost control of Lower Nubia, where the garrisons—which had been regularly replaced with fresh troops—settled and were partly assimilated. The Karmah state overran and incorporated the region. Some Egyptian officials resident in the Second Cataract area served the new rulers. The site of Karmah has yielded many Egyptian artifacts, including old pieces pillaged from their original contexts. Most were items of trade between the two countries, some probably destined for exchange against goods imported from sub-Saharan Africa. Around the end of the Middle Kingdom and during the Second Intermediate period, Medjay tribesmen from the Eastern Desert settled in the Nile valley from around Memphis to the Third Cataract. Their presence is marked by distinctive shallow graves with black-topped pottery, and they have traditionally been termed the “Pan-grave” culture by archaeologists. They were assimilated culturally in the New Kingdom, but the word Medjay came to mean police or militia; they probably came as mercenaries.
The Second Intermediate period
The increasing competition for power in Egypt and Nubia
crystallized in the formation of two new dynasties: the 15th, called the Hyksos (c. 1630–c. 1523 BCE),
with its capital at Avaris (Tell
el-Dabʿa) in the delta, and the 17th (c. 1630–1540 BCE),
ruling from Thebes. The word Hyksos dates to an Egyptian
phrase meaning “ruler of foreign lands” and occurs in Manetho’s narrative cited
in the works of the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (1st
century CE), which depicts the new rulers as sacrilegious invaders who
despoiled the land. They presented themselves—with the exception of the title
Hyksos—as Egyptian kings and appear to have been accepted as such. The main line of Hyksos was acknowledged throughout Egypt and may have been recognized
as overlords in Palestine, but they tolerated other lines of kings, both those
of the 17th dynasty and the various minor Hyksos who are termed the 16th
dynasty. The 15th dynasty consisted of six kings, the best known being the
fifth, Apopis,
who reigned for up to 40 years. There were many 17th-dynasty kings, probably
belonging to several different families. The northern frontier of the Theban
domain was at Al-Qūṣiyyah, but there was trade across the border.
Asiatic rule brought many technical innovations to Egypt, as well as cultural innovations such as new musical instruments and foreign loan words. The changes affected techniques from bronze working and pottery to weaving, and new breeds of animals and new crops were introduced. In warfare, composite bows, new types of daggers and scimitars, and above all the horse and chariot transformed previous practice, although the chariot may ultimately have been as important as a prestige vehicle as for tactical military advantages it conferred. The effect of these changes was to bring Egypt, which had been technologically backward, onto the level of southwestern Asia. Because of these advances and the perspectives they opened up, Hykso's rule was decisive for Egypt’s later empire in the Middle East.
Whereas the 13th dynasty was fairly prosperous, the Second intermediate period may have been impoverished. The regional center of the cult
of Osiris at Abydos, which has produced the largest quantity of Middle Kingdom
monuments lost importance, but sites such as Thebes, Idfū, and Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar
have yielded significant, if sometimes crudely worked, remains. Aside from
Avaris itself, virtually no information has come from the north, where the
Hyksos ruled, and it is impossible to assess their impact on the economy or on
high culture. The Second Intermediate period was the consequence of political
fragmentation and immigration and was not associated with economic collapse, as
in the early First Intermediate Period.
Toward the end of the 17th dynasty (c. 1545 BCE),
the Theban king Seqenenre challenged
Apopis, probably dying in battle against him. Seqenenre’s successor, Kamose, renewed the
challenge, stating in an inscription that it was intolerable to share his land
with an Asiatic and a Nubian (the Karmah ruler). By the end of his third regnal
year, he had made raids as far south as the Second Cataract (and possibly much
farther) and in the north to the neighborhood of Avaris, also intercepting in
the Western
Desert a letter sent from Apophis to a new Karmah ruler on his
accession. By campaigning to the north and to the south, Kamose acted out
his implicit claim
to the territory ruled by Egypt in the Middle Kingdom. His exploits formed a
vital stage in the long struggle to expel the Hyksos.
Post a Comment