 |
| The pre-dynastic and early dynastic periods in ancient Egypt |
Predynastic Egypt
The peoples of predynastic Egypt were the successors of the Paleolithic inhabitants of northeastern Africa, who had spread over much of its area; during wet phases, they had left remains in regions as inhospitable as the Great Sand Sea. The final desiccation of the Sahara was not complete until the end of the 3rd millennium BCE; over thousands of years people must have migrated from there to the Nile valley, the environment of which improved as the region dried out. In this process, the decisive change from the nomadic hunter-gatherer way of life of Paleolithic times to settled agriculture has not so far been identified. Sometime after 5000 BCE, the raising of crops was introduced, probably on a horticultural scale, in small local cultures that seem to have penetrated southward through Egypt into the oases and Sudan. Several of the basic food plants that were grown are native to the Middle East, so the new techniques probably spread from there. No large-scale migration need has been involved, and the cultures were at first largely self-contained. The preserved evidence for them is unrepresentative because it comes from the low desert, where relatively few people lived; as was the case later, most people probably settled in the valley and delta.
The earliest known Neolithic cultures
in Egypt have been found at Marimda Banī Salāma, on the southwestern edge
of the delta, and farther to the southwest, in Al-Fayyūm.
The site at Marimda Banī Salāma, which dates to the 6th–5th millennium BCE,
gives evidence of settlement and shows that cereals were grown. In Al-Fayyūm,
where evidence dates to the 5th millennium BCE, the settlements were near
the shore of Lake Qārūn, and the settlers engaged in fishing. Marimda is a very
large site that was occupied for many centuries. The inhabitants lived in
lightly built huts; they may have buried their dead within their houses, but
areas, where burials have been found, may not have been occupied by dwellings at the same time. Pottery
was used in both cultures. In addition to these Egyptian Neolithic cultures,
others have been identified in the Western Desert,
in the Second Cataract area, and north of Khartoum. Some of these are as early
as the Egyptian ones, while others overlapped with the succeeding Egyptian
predynastic cultures.
In Upper
Egypt, between Asyūṭ and Luxor (Al-Uqṣur), have
been found the Tasian
culture (named for Dayr Tāsā) and the Badarian culture (named
for Al-Badārī); these date from the late 5th millennium BCE. Most of the
evidence for them comes from cemeteries, where the burials included fine
black-topped red pottery,
ornaments, some copper objects, and glazed steatite beads. The most
characteristic predynastic luxury objects, slate palettes for grinding
cosmetics, occur for the first time in this period. The burials show little
differentiation of wealth and status and seem to belong to a peasant culture without
central political organization.
Probably contemporary with both predynastic and dynastic times are
thousands of rock drawings of a wide range of motifs, including boats, found
throughout the Eastern
Desert, in Lower Nubia, and as far west as Mount ʾUwaynāt, which stands
near modern Egypt’s borders with Libya and Sudan in the
southwest. The drawings show that nomads were common throughout the desert,
probably to the late 3rd millennium BCE, but they cannot be dated
precisely; they may all have been produced by nomads, or inhabitants of the
Nile valley may often have penetrated the desert, and made drawings.
Naqādah I, named for the major site of Naqādah but also called Amratian for Al-ʿĀmirah is a distinct phase that succeeded the Badarian. It has been found as far south as Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar (Hierakonpolis; ancient Egyptian Nekhen), near the sandstone barrier of Mount Silsilah, which was the cultural boundary of Egypt in predynastic times. Naqādah I differs from its Badarian predecessor in its density of settlement and the typology of its material culture but hardly at all in the social organization implied by the archaeological finds. Burials were in shallow pits in which the bodies were placed facing to the west, like those of later Egyptians. Notable types of material found in graves are fine pottery decorated with representational designs in white on red, figurines of men and women, and hard stone mace heads that are the precursors of important late predynastic objects.
Naqādah II, also known as Gerzean for Girza (Jirza), is the most important predynastic culture. The heartland of its development was the same as that of Naqādah I, but it spread gradually throughout the country. South of Mount Silsilah, sites of the culturally similar Nubian A Group are found as far as the Second Cataract of the Nile and beyond; these have a long span, continuing as late as the Egyptian Early Dynastic period. During Naqādah II, large sites developed at Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, Naqādah, and Abydos (Abīdūs), showing by their size the concentration of settlement, as well as exhibiting increasing differentiation in wealth and status. Few sites have been identified between Asyūṭ and Al-Fayyūm, and this region may have been sparsely settled, perhaps supporting a pastoral rather than agricultural population. Near present-day Cairo—at Al-ʿUmāri, Al-Maʿādi, and Wādī Dijlah and stretching as far south as the latitude of Al-Fayyūm—are sites of a separate, contemporary culture. Al-Maʿādi was an extensive settlement that traded with the Middle East and probably acted as an intermediary for transmitting goods to the South. In this period, imports of lapis lazuli provide evidence that trade networks extended as far afield as Afghanistan.
The material culture of Naqādah II included increasing numbers
of prestigious objects.
The characteristic mortuary pottery is made of buff desert clay, principally
from around Qinā, and is decorated in red with pictures of uncertain meaning
showing boats, animals, and scenes with human figures. Stone vases, many made
of hard stones that come from remote areas of the Eastern Desert, are common
and of remarkable quality, and cosmetic palettes display elaborate designs,
with outlines in the form of animals, birds, or fish. Flint worked with
extraordinary skill to produce large ceremonial knives of a type that continued
in use during dynastic times.
Sites of late Naqādah II (sometimes termed Naqādah III) are found
throughout Egypt, including the Memphite area and the delta region, and appear
to have replaced the local Lower Egyptian cultures. Links with the Middle East
intensified, and some distinctively Mesopotamian motifs and objects were
briefly in fashion in Egypt. The cultural unification of the country probably
accompanied a political unification, but this must have proceeded in stages and
cannot be reconstructed in detail. In an intermediate stage, local states may
have formed at Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, Naqādah, and Abydos and
in the delta at such sites as Buto (modern Kawm al-Farāʿīn) and Sais (Ṣā
al-Ḥajar). Ultimately, Abydos became preeminent; its late predynastic cemetery
of Umm al-Qaʿāb was extended to form the burial place of the kings of the
1st dynasty.
In the latest predynastic period, objects bearing written symbols of royalty
were deposited throughout the country, and primitive writing also appeared in
marks on pottery. Because the basic symbol for the king, a falcon on a
decorated palace facade, hardly varies, these objects are thought to have
belonged to a single line of kings or a single state, not to a set of small
states. This symbol became the royal Horus name, the first
element in a king’s titulary, which presented the reigning king as the manifestation of
an aspect of the god Horus, the leading god of the country. Over the next few
centuries, several further definitions of the king’s presence were added to this
one.
Thus, at this time Egypt seems to have been a state unified under
kings who introduced writing and the first bureaucratic administration.
These kings, who could have ruled for more than a century, may correspond with
a set of names preserved on the Palermo Stone, but no
direct identification can be made between them. The latest was probably Narmer, whose name has
been found near Memphis,
at Abydos, on a ceremonial palette and macehead from Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, and at
the Palestinian sites of Tall Gat and ʿArad. The relief scenes
on the palette show him wearing the two chief crowns of Egypt and
defeating northern enemies, but these probably are stereotyped symbols
of the king’s power and role and not records of specific events of his reign.
They demonstrate that the position of the king in society and its presentation
in mixed pictorial and written form had been elaborated by the early 3rd millennium BCE.
إرسال تعليق